Machine learning for prediction of concurrent endometrial carcinoma in patients diagnosed with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia.

OBJECTIVE: To identify predictive clinico-pathologic factors for concurrent endometrial carcinoma (EC) among patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) using machine learning. METHODS: a retrospective analysis of 160 patients with a biopsy proven EIN. We analyzed the performance of multiple machine learning models (n = 48) with different parameters to predict the diagnosis of postoperative EC. The prediction variables included: parity, gestations, sampling method, endometrial thickness, age, body mass index, diabetes, hypertension, serum CA-125, preoperative histology and preoperative hormonal therapy. Python 'sklearn' library was used to train and test the models. The model performance was evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and AUC. Five iterations of internal cross-validation were performed, and the mean values were used to compare between the models. RESULTS: Of the 160 women with a preoperative diagnosis of EIN, 37.5% (60) had a post-op diagnosis of EC. In univariable analysis, there were no significant predictors of EIN. For the five best machine learning models, all the models had a high specificity (71%-88%) and a low sensitivity (23%-51%). Logistic regression model had the highest specificity 88%, XG Boost had the highest sensitivity 51%, and the highest positive predictive value 62% and negative predictive value 73%. The highest area under the curve was achieved by the random forest model 0.646. CONCLUSIONS: Even using the most elaborate AI algorithms, it is not possible currently to predict concurrent EC in women with a preoperative diagnosis of EIN. As women with EIN have a high risk of concurrent EC, there may be a value of surgical staging including sentinel lymph node evaluation, to more precisely direct adjuvant treatment in the event EC is identified on final pathology.

Diagnosis and management of endometrial hyperplasia: A UK national audit of adherence to national guidance 2012-2020.

BACKGROUND: Endometrial hyperplasia (EH) is a precusor lesion for endometrial cancer (EC), the commonest gynaecological malignancy in high-income countries. EH is a proliferation of glandular tissue, classified as either non-atypical endometrial hyperplasia (NEH) or, if the cytological features are abnormal, atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH). The clinical significance of AEH is that patients face both a high risk of having occult EC and a high risk of progression to EC if untreated. Recommendations on the care of women with EH were introduced by United Kingdom-wide guidance (Green-top Guide No. 67, 2016). National adherence to guidance is unknown. We aimed to describe the care of patients with EH; to compare the patterns of care for those with EH with national guidance to identify opportunities for quality improvement; and to compare patterns of care prior to and following the introduction of national guidance to understand its impact. METHODS AND FINDINGS: In this UK-wide patient-level clinical audit, we included 3,307 women who received a new histological diagnosis of EH through a gynaecology service between 1 January 2012 and 30 June 2020. We described first-line management, management at 2 years, and surgical characteristics prior to and following national guidance for EH using proportions and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and compared process measures between time periods using multilevel Poisson regression. Of the 3,307 patients, 1,570 had NEH and 1,511 had AEH between 2012 and 2019. An additional 85 patients had NEH and 141 had AEH during 2020. Prior to national guidance, 9% (95% CI [6%, 15%]) received no initial treatment for NEH compared with 3% (95% CI [1%, 5%]) post-guidance; 31% (95% CI [26%, 36%]) and 48% (95% CI [43% 53%]) received an intrauterine progestogen, respectively, in the same periods. The predominant management of women with AEH did not differ, with 68% (95% CI [61%, 74%]) and 67% (95 CI [63%, 71%]) receiving first-line hysterectomy, respectively. By 2 years, follow-up to histological regression without hysterectomy increased from 38% (95% CI [33%, 43%]) to 52% (95% CI [47%, 58%]) for those with NEH (rate ratio (RR) 1.38, 95% CI [1.18, 1.63] p < 0.001). We observed an increase in the use of total laparoscopic hysterectomy among those with AEH (RR 1.26, 95% CI [1.04, 1.52]). In the later period, 37% (95% CI [29%, 44%]) of women initially diagnosed with AEH who underwent a first-line hysterectomy, received an upgraded diagnosis of EC. Study limitations included retrospective data collection from routine clinical documentation and the inability to comprehensively understand the shared decision-making process where care differed from guidance. CONCLUSIONS: The care of patients with EH has changed in accordance with national guidance. More women received first-line medical management of NEH and were followed up to histological regression. The follow-up of those with AEH who do not undergo hysterectomy must be improved, given their very high risk of coexistent cancer and high risk of developing cancer.

Prediction of complete regression in fertility-sparing patients with endometrial cancer and apical hyperplasia: the GLOBAL model in a large Chinese cohort.

BACKGROUND: Fertility preservation treatment is increasingly essential for patients with apical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) and early endometrial cancer (EEC) worldwide. Complete regression (CR) is the main endpoint of this treatment. Accurately predicting CR and implementing appropriate interventions during treatment are crucial for these patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study involving 193 patients diagnosed with atypical AEH or EEC, enrolled from January 2012 to March 2022 at our center. We evaluated 24 clinical parameters as candidate predictors and employed LASSO regression to develop a prediction model for CR. Subsequently, a nomogram was constructed to predict CR after the treatment. We evaluated the performance of the nomogram using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) to assess its predictive accuracy. Additionally, we employed cumulative curves to determine the CR rate among patients. RESULTS: Out of the 193 patients, 173 achieved CR after undergoing fertility preservation treatment. We categorized features with similar properties and provided a list of formulas based on their coefficients. The final model, named GLOBAL (including basic information, characteristics, blood pressure, glucose metabolism, lipid metabolism, immunohistochemistry, histological type, and medication), comprised eight variables identified using LASSO regression. A nomogram incorporating these eight risk factors was developed to predict CR. The GLOBAL model exhibited an AUC of 0.907 (95% CI 0.828-0.969). Calibration plots demonstrated a favorable agreement between the predicted probability by the GLOBAL model and actual observations in the cohort. The cumulative curve analysis revealed varying cumulative CR rates among patients in the eight subgroups. Categorized analysis demonstrated significant diversity in the effects of the GLOBAL model on CR among patients with different total points (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: We have developed and validated a model that significantly enhances the predictive accuracy of CR in AEH and EEC patients seeking fertility preservation treatment.

Characteristic hysteroscopy appearance considerations for detecting uterine endometrial malignancies.

AIM: The effectiveness of hysteroscopy in diagnosing endometrial lesions has been demonstrated, showing high diagnostic accuracy for malignant endometrial lesions. Although the characteristic appearances of atypical and malignant endometria have been reported, they are not definitive and sometimes complicated. This study aimed to identify a small number of characteristic features to detect endometrial abnormalities using a simple judgment system and analyze the diagnostic characteristics and their accuracy in endometrial malignancy diagnosis. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of hysteroscopy video data of 250 patients, of which we selected for analysis based on pathology examination 152 cases with benign changes, 16 with atypical endometrium, and 18 with carcinoma in situ or endometrial cancer. Endometrial characteristics assessed included protrusion, desquamation, extended vessel, atypical vessel, and white/yellow lesion. RESULTS: Multivariable analysis revealed that desquamation (p = 0.001, odds ratio [OR] 5.28), atypical vessels (p < 0.001, OR 8.50), and white/yellow lesions (p = 0.011, OR 1.37) were significant predictors for endometrial malignancy. From their contribution status, scoring points of 4, 6, and 1 were settled according to the odds ratio proportions. When scores ≥5 (at least both desquamation and white/yellow lesions or only atypical vessels) were used to define endometrial malignancy, sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 92%, respectively. When detecting cancer, atypical, and benign cases, sensitivity and specificity were 88% and 90%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our characteristics hysteroscopic findings showed a higher predictive ability in detecting endometrial malignancies. However, further examination with more cases would be needed to accurately diagnose endometrial malignancy by hysteroscopy.

Risk-stratification machine learning model using demographic factors, gynaecological symptoms and ß-catenin for endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Demographic features, suggestive gynaecological symptoms, and immunohistochemical expression of endometrial ß-catenin have a prognostic capacity for endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma. This study assessed the interaction of all variables and developed risk stratification for endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted from January 2023 to July 2023 at two teaching hospitals in Makassar Indonesia. Patients (< 70 years old) with suggestive symptoms of endometrial hyperplasia or carcinoma or being referred with disease code N.85 who underwent curettage and/or surgery for pathology assessment except those receiving radiotherapy, or chemotherapy, presence of another carcinoma, coagulation disorder, and history of anti-inflammatory drug use and unreadable samples. Demographic, and clinical symptoms were collected from medical records. Immunohistochemistry staining using mouse-monoclonal antibodies determined the ß-catenin expression (percentage, intensity, and H-score) in endometrial tissues. Ordinal and Binary Logistic regression identified the potential predictors to be included in neural networks and decision tree models of histopathological grading according to the World Health Organization/WHO grading classification. RESULTS: Abdominal enlargement was associated with worse pathological grading (adjusted odds ratio/aOR 6.7 95% CI 1.8-24.8). Increasing age (aOR 1.1 95% CI 1.03-1.2) and uterus bleeding (aOR 5.3 95% CI 1.3-21.6) were associated with carcinoma but not with %ß-catenin and H-Score. However, adjusted by vaginal bleeding and body mass index, lower %ß-catenin (aOR 1.03 95% 1.01-1.05) was associated with non-atypical hyperplasia, as well as H-Score (aOR 1.01 95% CI 1.01-1.02). Neural networks and Decision tree risk stratification showed a sensitivity of 80-94.8% and a specificity of 40.6-60% in differentiating non-atypical from atypical and carcinoma. A cutoff of 55% ß-catenin area and H-Score of 110, along with other predictors could distinguish non-atypical samples from atypical and carcinoma. CONCLUSION: Risk stratification based on demographics, clinical symptoms, and ß-catenin possesses a good performance in differentiating non-atypical hyperplasia with later stages.

Management of Endometrial Intraepithelial Neoplasia or Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia: ACOG Clinical Consensus No. 5.

SUMMARY: Endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) or atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) often is a precursor lesion to adenocarcinoma of the endometrium. Hysterectomy is the definitive treatment for EIN-AEH. When a conservative (fertility-sparing) approach to the management of EIN-AEH is under consideration, it is important to attempt to exclude the presence of endometrial cancer to avoid potential undertreatment of an unknown malignancy in those who have been already diagnosed with EIN-AEH. Given the high risk of progression to cancer, those who do not have surgery require progestin therapy (oral, intrauterine, or combined) and close surveillance. Although data are conflicting and limited, studies have demonstrated that treatment with the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device results in a higher regression rate when compared with treatment with oral progestins alone. Limited data suggest that cyclic progestational agents have lower regression rates when compared with continuous oral therapy. After initial conservative treatment for EIN-AEH, early detection of disease persistence, progression, or recurrence requires careful follow-up. Gynecologists and other clinicians should counsel patients that lifestyle modification resulting in weight loss and glycemic control can improve overall health and may decrease the risk of EIN-AEH and endometrial cancer.

Diagnostic Importance of PAX2, ARID1A, and FOXA1 Biomarkers in Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the contribution of PAX2, ARID1A, and FOXA1 biomarkers to diagnosis in cases with atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH). STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive Study. Place and Duration of the Study: Pathology Department of Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, from January 2018 to December 2020. METHODOLOGY: Curettage materials of 100 patients diagnosed with AEH which stained PAX2, ARID1A, and FOXA1, were evaluated. The staining patterns in the atypical endometrial glandular areas were grouped as slight-no loss, moderate loss, and complete loss / severe loss for all three biomarkers. Complete or/severe loss in AEH was considered helpful in the diagnosis. RESULTS: Complete loss / severe loss rates in curettages were 84% for PAX2, 5% for ARID1A, and 15% for FOXA1, respectively. When used in combination, complete loss / severe loss rates were 85% in at least one of the three markers, 84% in PAX2 and/or ARID1A, 85% in PAX2 and/or FOXA1, and 17% in ARID1A and/or FOXA1. CONCLUSION: Although all 3 biomarkers showed marked staining loss, PAX2 is the most sensitive biomarker for the diagnosis of AEH in curettage materials. KEY WORDS: Endometrium, Atypical hyperplasia, PAX2, ARID1A, FOXA1.

Association of body mass index with early age at diagnosis of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia.

OBJECTIVE: Elevated body mass index (BMI) is a risk factor for endometrioid endometrial cancer and its precursor, endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN). Our objective was to describe the association between BMI and age at EIN diagnosis. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of patients diagnosed with EIN from 2010 to 2020 at a large academic medical center. Patient characteristics were stratified by menopausal status and compared using a chi-square or t-test. We used linear regression to determine the parameter estimate (ß) and 95% confidence interval for the association between BMI and age at diagnosis. RESULTS: We identified 513 patients with EIN; 503 (98%) had complete medical records. Premenopausal patients were more likely to be nulliparous and to have polycystic ovary syndrome than postmenopausal patients (both p ≤ 0.001). Postmenopausal patients were more likely to have hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and hyperlipidemia (all p ≤ 0.02). There was a significant linear association between BMI and age at diagnosis in premenopausal patients (ß = -0.19 (95% CI: -0.27, -0.10). In premenopausal patients, for every 1-unit increase in BMI, age at diagnosis decreased by 0.19 years. No association was observed in postmenopausal patients. CONCLUSIONS: In a large cohort of patients with EIN, increasing BMI was associated with an earlier age at diagnosis in premenopausal patients. This data suggests consideration of endometrial sampling in younger patients with known risk factors for excess estrogen exposure.

Utility of a PAX2, PTEN, and ß-catenin Panel in the Diagnosis of Atypical Hyperplasia/Endometrioid Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Endometrial Polyps.

The diagnosis of atypical hyperplasia/endometrioid intraepithelial neoplasm (AH/EIN) within endometrial polyps (EMPs) often poses a diagnostic conundrum. Our previous studies demonstrated that a panel of immunohistochemical (IHC) markers consisting of PAX2, PTEN, and ß-catenin can be effectively utilized for the identification of AH/EIN. A total of 105 AH/EIN within EMP were analyzed using the 3-marker panel. We also evaluated these cases for the presence of morules. Benign EMP (n=90) and AH/EIN unassociated with polyp (n=111) served as controls. Aberrant expression of PAX2, PTEN, or ß-catenin was observed in AH/EIN in EMP in 64.8%, 39.0%, and 61.9% of cases, respectively. At least 1 IHC marker was abnormal in 92.4% of cases. Overall, 60% of AH/EIN in EMP demonstrated abnormal results for≥2 IHC markers. The prevalence of PAX2 aberrancy was significantly lower in AH/EIN in EMP than in nonpolyp AH/EIN (64.8% vs. 81.1%, P =0.007), but higher than in benign EMP (64.8% vs. 14.4%, P <0.00001). The prevalence of ß-catenin aberrancy was significantly higher in AH/EIN in EMP than in nonpolyp AH/EIN (61.9% vs. 47.7%, P =0.037). All control benign EMP demonstrated normal expression of PTEN and ß-catenin. Morules were present in 38.1% of AH/EIN in EMP versus 24.3% in nonpolyp AH/EIN, and absent in benign EMP. A strong positive association was found between ß-catenin and morules (Φ=0.64). Overall, 90% cases of atypical polypoid adenomyoma (n=6) and mucinous papillary proliferation (n=4) showed IHC marker aberrancy. In conclusion, the 3-marker IHC panel (PAX2, PTEN, and ß-catenin) is (1) a useful tool in the diagnosis of AH/EIN in EMP; (2) PAX2 loss should be interpreted with caution and in combination with morphology and other markers.

Hysteroscopic biopsy compared with endometrial curettage to assess the preoperative rate of atypical hyperplasia underestimating endometrial carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the rate of atypical hyperplasia (AH) underestimating endometrial cancer (EC) comparing endometrial biopsy (EB) accomplished by hysteroscopic biopsy with dilatation and curettage (D&C). Second, to compare the two techniques to foresee EC grading. METHODS: This trial was based on the findings of two Gynecological Departments within the same Public Utility, sharing pathological service and database but routinely performing EB under hysteroscopic visualization (group A) or hysteroscopy followed by D&C (group B). We retrieved the clinical data of patients showing EC on hysterectomy throughout a 10-year period. The accuracy of hysteroscopic-view diagnosis and EB pathology were compared, having the pathologic findings of hysterectomy as reference. RESULTS: A total of 161 patients met the inclusion criteria. Among these, 109 and 52 were included in groups A and B, respectively. In group A, 32.1% of patients underwent EB in an out-patient setting. To foresee EC, hysteroscopic view showed a sensitivity of 82.5% and 70.2% in groups A and B, respectively (P = 0.019). An underestimation of EC diagnosed as AH on EB was found in 20 patients (12.4%). Among these, 18 (16.5%) and 2 (3.8%) were included in groups A and B, respectively (P = 0.022). In group A, a fault diagnosis of AH resulted higher when EB was performed as out-patient setting (P = 0.006). EB allowed the grading of EC in 73.3% and 90.3% of patients in groups A and B, respectively. The agreement was 73.7% and 85.1%, leading to moderate (κ = 0.56) and good (κ = 0.77) "κ" coefficient of concordance for groups A and B, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: EB performed by D&C lowers the rate of AH underestimating concurrent EC and improves the grading agreement when compared with hysteroscopic sampling.

Prognosis of direct pregnancy in untreated atypical endometrial hyperplasia: a case report.

BACKGROUND: An increasing number of atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) or endometrial cancer (EC) patients with fertility requirements choose conservative management, such as oral high-dose progesterone. Most of them use assisted reproductive technology (ART) to become pregnant after experiencing remission. However, the outcome of pregnancy is not ideal, probably because of long-term drug application in large doses or invasive uterine cavity treatment. CASE REPORT: We presented a case of AEH who underwent direct pregnancy with good results without any treatment for her pathological endometrium. We described her endometrial histological results pre-and post-pregnancy in detail, hitherto absent from reports on this topic. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a strong desire to bear children at the time of an AEH diagnosis could consider taking 1-2 years to try a pregnancy before treating their AEH.

Could soluble L1 cell adhesion molecule (sL1CAM) in serum be a new biomarker for endometrial cancer?

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to evaluate the place of serum soluble L1 cell adhesion molecule (sL1CAM) level in the diagnosis of endometrial cancer and its relationship with clinicopathological features. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was performed with 146 patients who underwent endometrial biopsy and whose pathology results were reported as benign endometrial changes (n = 30), endometrial hyperplasia (n = 32) or endometrial cancer (n = 84). The sL1CAM level between the groups was compared. The relationship between clinicopathological features and serum sL1CAM was evaluated in patients with endometrial cancer. RESULTS: The mean serum sL1CAM level in patients with endometrial cancer was significantly higher than in patients without cancer. The sL1CAM value was statistically significantly higher in the group with endometrial cancer, than the group with endometrial hyperplasia (p < 0.001) and the group with benign endometrial changes (p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in terms of sL1CAM between the group of patients with endometrial hyperplasia and the group of patients with benign endometrial changes (p = 0.954). sL1CAM value in type 2 endometrial cancer was statistically significantly higher than Type1 (p = 0.019). High sL1CAM level in patients with type 1 cancer was associated with poor clinicopathological features. However, no correlation was observed between clinicopathological features and serum sL1CAM level in type 2 endometrial cancers. CONCLUSIONS: Serum sL1CAM may be an important marker for evaluating the diagnosis and prognosis of endometrial cancer in the future. There may be a relationship between increased serum sL1CAM level in type 1 endometrial cancers and poor clinicopathological features.

Development and Validation of a Nomogram Prediction Model for Endometrial Malignancy in Patients with Abnormal Uterine Bleeding.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify the risk factors and sonographic variables that could be integrated into a predictive model for endometrial cancer (EC) and atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) in women with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 1837 patients who presented with AUB and underwent endometrial sampling. Multivariable logistic regression was developed based on clinical and sonographic covariates [endometrial thickness (ET), resistance index (RI) of the endometrial vasculature] assessed for their association with EC/AEH in the development group (n=1369), and a predictive nomogram was proposed. The model was validated in 468 patients. RESULTS: Histological examination revealed 167 patients (12.2%) with EC or AEH in the development group. Using multivariable logistic regression, the following variables were incorporated in the prediction of endometrial malignancy: metabolic diseases [odds ratio (OR)=7.764, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 5.042-11.955], family history (OR=3.555, 95% CI 1.055-11.971), age ≥40 years (OR=3.195, 95% CI 1.878-5.435), RI ≤0.5 (OR=8.733, 95% CI 4.311-17.692), and ET ≥10 mm (OR=8.479, 95% CI 5.440-13.216). A nomogram was created using these five variables with an area under the curve of 0.837 (95% CI 0.800-0.874). The calibration curve showed good agreement between the observed and predicted occurrences. For the validation group, the model provided acceptable discrimination and calibration. CONCLUSION: The proposed nomogram model showed moderate prediction accuracy in the differentiation between benign and malignant endometrial lesions among women with AUB.

Endometrial Thickness Measurement as Predictor of Endometrial Hyperplasia and Cancer in Perimenopausal Uterine Bleeding: Cross-Sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: Endometrial thickness (ET) measurement was an alternative method for predicting abnormal endometrial pathology in postmenopausal bleeding. Cut-off value of ET measurement could not be use in perimenopausal bleeding. OBJECTIVE: Aim of this study was to investigate appropriate ET cut-off value for perimenopause women with abnormal uterine bleeding (PEMB) and abnormal endometrial histopathology. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study. PEMB at Bhumibol Adulyadej Hospital between July 2018 and June 2022 were recruited. Subjects who met inclusion criteria underwent ET measurement and endometrial biopsy via endometrial aspirator. Participants who had histopathology report of endometrial hyperplasia and more were classified as the study group. The Control group were subjects with no endometrial hyperplasia or cancer. Demographic and clinical character data were included. Correlation of ET and endometrial histopathology were calculated for statistical significance. RESULTS: A total of 304 cases were included. After exclusion, 254 subjects were recruited for this study. There were 22 and 232 cases in the study and control groups, respectively. The mean age and body mass index (BMI) of participants were 44.7 years old and 27.5 kg/m2, respectively. Prevalence of endometrial hyperplasia and cancer in perimenopausal uterine bleeding were 7.5 (19/254) and 1.2 (3/254) percent, respectively. Endometrial thickness equal to and more than 8 mm was associated with abnormal endometrial histopathology with statistical significance. Age, BMI, nulliparity, anovulatory bleeding history, hypothyroidism, diabetes mellitus and anovulation state of both groups were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Endometrial thickness equal or more than 8 mm were significantly associated with endometrial hyperplasia or more among perimenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding.

Asymptomatic endometrial thickening in postmenopausal women: predictor of malignant pathology?

It is not standardised what is the endometrial thickness that discriminates between normal and potentially malignant. The objective of this study was to determine the endometrial thickness cut-off point from which the risk of endometrial cancer (EC) increases in asymptomatic postmenopausal women; and to evaluate the risk factors linked to malignant endometrial pathology as well as other associated ultrasound findings.This was a retrospective observational study that included hysteroscopies performed at the Hospital Materno-Infantil on 267 asymptomatic menopausal women with an increase in endometrial thickness (AET) >5 mm, from 2015 to 2019. The results shows that the prevalence of malignant pathology in asymptomatic postmenopausal women with a casual finding of endometrial thickening was 3.7%. This percentage was 16.3% when the cut-off point of AET was established at 10 mm. There was a significant association for the diagnosis of malignant pathology with this cut-off point.There is a significant association between the 10 mm endometrial thickness cut-off point from which the risk of EC increases in asymptomatic postmenopausal women.Impact statementWhat is already known on this subject? Several studies have established the cut-off point for asymptomatic endometrial thickening (AET) for atypical endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer at 10 mm. Although no cut-off point has optimal accuracy for the diagnosis of malignant endometrial pathology, it has been found that with a cut-off value of AET >10 mm no cases are missed. Likewise, a cut-off point of AET > 11 mm may provide a balance between cancer detection and histopathological workup extension.What do the results of this study add? A significant association was found at the cut-off point of AET > 10 mm, which suggests that screening postmenopausal women at this thickness is acceptable and unlikely to miss cases of endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? After analysing our results we can conclude, like other published studies, that by establishing a cut-off point of 10 mm we obtain a good discrimination between benign and malignant pathology, which would allow us to diagnose 100% of malignant pathology. Above this cut-off point, the risk of endometrial cancer increases, and it would therefore be advisable to extend the study. A multicentre study is needed to confirm the cut-off point at which the risk of endometrial cancer increases in postmenopausal women with asymptomatic endometrial thickening.

Endometrial Hyperplasia.

The objectives of this Clinical Expert Series on endometrial hyperplasia are to review the etiology and risk factors, histologic classification and subtypes, malignant progression risks, prevention options, and to outline both surgical and nonsurgical treatment options. Abnormal uterine and postmenopausal bleeding remain the hallmark of endometrial pathology, and up to 10-20% of postmenopausal bleeding will be either hyperplasia or cancer; thus, immediate evaluation of any abnormal bleeding with either tissue procurement for pathology or imaging should be undertaken. Although anyone with a uterus may develop atypical hyperplasia, also known as endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN), genetic predispositions (eg, Lynch syndrome), obesity, chronic anovulation, and polycystic ovarian syndrome all markedly increase these risks, whereas use of oral contraceptive pills or progesterone-containing intrauterine devices will decrease the risk. An EIN diagnosis carries a high risk of concomitant endometrial cancer or eventual progression to cancer in the absence of treatment. The definitive and curative treatment for EIN remains hysterectomy; however, the obesity epidemic, the potential desire for fertility-sparing treatments, the recognition of varying rates of malignant transformation, medical comorbidities, and an aging population all may factor into decisions to employ nonsurgical treatment modalities.

Cystic endometrial hyperplasia and uterine adenocarcinoma in two miniature pigs.

Due to the increasing popularity of minipigs as pets, the frequency of presentation to the veterinarian is increasing as well. In addition to routine measures such as claw trimming, vaccination and antiparasitic treatment, diagnostics, and therapy of diseased minipigs are also common activities in the veterinary practice. In recent years, we have noticed more and more pathological changes of the female genital tract of uncastrated minipigs. There are also some case reports available in the international literature in this regard. The following case report describes the diagnostic procedures and ovariohysterectomies of 2 13-year-old female minipigs in detail. In these cases, uterine adenocarcinoma, and uterine carcinoma, respectively, combined with cystic endometrial hyperplasia (CEH) of the endometrium were diagnosed.

Direct hysteroscopic endometrial sampling and pipelle sampling in perimenopausal women.

BACKGROUND: Abnormal uterine bleeding is a common cause of hospital admission in perimenopausal women. It can be the first sign of many diseases such as endometrial cancer and endometrial hyperplasia. Endometrial sampling is valuable in early diagnosis and treatment. Although hysterectomy is the gold standard in the diagnosis of endometrial pathology, it is not considered an acceptable method for diagnosis. With the principle of "see and treat, hysteroscopy seems to be the most successful method. METHODS: After obtaining the necessary ethics committee approval, we obtained liquid-based cytology samples of our perimenopausal patients who frequently applied to our outpatient clinic with abnormal uterine bleeding. To conduct endometrial sampling of our patients, we used pipelle aspiration method in our 75-disease group and direct hysteroscopic sampling method in our other 75 disease group. We then compared the pre- and postoperative pathology results. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between preoperative and postoperative pathological results in both pipelle and hysteroscopic sampling groups. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of endometrial pathologies by hysteroscopic method and pipelle method has high sensitivity and specificity. Gynecologists may determine the method preference according to the status of the health system together with their patients.